28NAT ··. 0201.2.1.14/1. “Kanphim phaenthi sadaeng railaiad kansia dindaen” [Printing of Maps to Explain Our Loss of Territory], 5291/2483. Prime Minister to Department of Interior, December 30, 1940.
29我在曼谷的国家纪念馆向馆敞提问，为什么失土地图上没有显示割让英国的土地，这是馆敞当时给我的解释。
30Suphaphorn Bumrungwong, “Kanriakrong lae kanbokrong dindaen thi khuen cak Farangsed 2483–2491” [Requesting and Governing the Territories Returned from France, 1940–1948] (Ph.D. diss., Chulalongkorn University, 2003), p. 66.
31Kullada Kesboonchoo Mead, The Rise and Decline of Thai Absolutism (London: Routledge, 2009), p. 31.
32Pramuan hedkan nai yuk mai khong Thai, January 4, 1942.
33Luang Nathabanja, Extra-territoriality in Siam (Bangkok: Bangkok Daily Mail, 1924), p. 5.
34Patrick Tuck, The French Wolf and the Siamese Lamb: The French Threat to Siamese Independence, 1858–1907 (Bangkok: White Lotus Press, 1995), p. 121.
35Yomiuri Shimbun, quoted in the Bangkok Times, May 31, 1941.
36Pramuan hedkan nai yuk mai khong Thai, January 13, 1942.
37Nikorn, July 11, 1942.
38Ibid. The article neglects to mention how Japan also demanded extraterritorial privileges for its own citizens in Thailand.
39Japan Times and Advertiser, March 12, 1941.
40在泰国侵入印度支那硕，美国拒绝将泰国军方已经付款的战机贰给泰国军方，以示对泰国的不蛮。
41泰国民众对捧本斡旋的结果式到失望，因为他们遭到宣传误导，以为如果战争可以再持续几周，泰国军方可以夺回更加多得多的土地（包括吴铬窟与暹粒）。See E. Bruce Reynolds, Thailand and Japan’s Southern Advance, 1940–1945 (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 1994), pp. 49–51.
42NAT ··. 0701.28.27. “Thai Regards Nippon as True Friend: States Bangkok Minister in Interview.”
43Ibid.
44Ibid.
45Pramuan hedkan nai yuk mai khong Thai, December 14, 1941.
46Reynolds, Thailand and Japan’s Southern Advance, p. 154.
47NAT ··. 2.2.6/10. “Chomphon Phibun Songkhram Nayok Rathamontri Prathedthai klaw kae thahan Yipun nai okad wan khuen pi mai” [Prime Minister Phibun Songkhram Gives New Year’s Address to Japanese Troops], January 1, 1942.
48NAT ··. 2.2.6/3. “Kanprachum hai samphad rawang than akharathud Yipun pracam Prathedthai kab phuthaen nangsuephim Thai” [Japanese Ambassador to Thailand Gives Interview to Thai Media), April 3, 1942.
49Robert S. Ward, Asia for the Asiatics: The Techniques of Japanese Occupation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1945), p. 189.
50Okawa Shumei, “The Establishment of the Greater East Asian Order,” in Joyce C. Lebra (ed.), Japan’s Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere in World War II (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1975), pp. 39–40.
51Martin W. Lewis and K·ren E. Wigen, The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997).
52E. Bruce Reynolds, “The Indian Community and the Indian Independence Movement in Thailand during World War II,” in Paul H. Kratoska (ed.), Southeast Asian Minorities in the Wartime Japanese Empire (London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2002), p. 172.
53Sunsap khong phon than Chomphon Phibun Songkhram Nayok Rathamontri haeng Prathedthai tob sunsap khong phon than Nai Phonek Tojo Nayok Rathamonti haeng prathed Yipun thang withayu kracai siang [A Radio Address from Prime Minister Phibun Songkhram of Thailand and Prime Minister Tojo of Japan] (Bangkok: Krom Khosanakan, December 23, 1941).
54Pramuan hedkan nai yuk mai khong Thai, February 14, 1942.
55Ibid., February 11, 1942.
56Ibid., December 16, 1941.
57Ibid., December 20, 1941.
58Ibid., January 17, 1941.
59Japan Times and Advertiser, March 14, 1941.
60Ibid., March 12, 1941.
61Pramuan hedkan nai yuk mai khong Thai, February 14, 1942.
62Ibid., December 18, 1941.
63NAT ··. 2.2.6/3. “Kanprachum hai samphad rawang than akharathud Yipun pracam Prathedthai kab phuthaen nangsuephim Thai” [Press Conference of Thai Reporters with the Japanese Ambassador to Thailand], April 3, 1942.
64Eiji Murashima, “The Thai-Japanese Alliance and the Chinese of Thailand,” in Kratoska, Southeast Asian Minorities, p. 197.
65Pramuan hedkan nai yuk mai khong Thai, January 7, 1942.
66NAT ··. 9.2.3/4. “Kamakan Samakhom Chin khawphob than Nayok” [Chinese Commerce Group Meets with Prime Minister], Prachamit, December 28, 1941. Also see Eiji Murashima, “Opposing French Colonialism: Thailand and the Independence Movements in Indochina in the Early 1940s,” Southeast Asia Research 13:3 (2005), and Reynolds, “The Indian Community and the Indian Independence Movement.”
67NAT FO/12/4059.
68Support for Lao Issara and the Viet Minh will be discussed in the next chapter. See also Christopher E. Goscha, Thailand and the Southeast Asian Networks of the Viet- namese Revolution: 1885–1954 (Richmond, Surrey: RoutledgeCurzon, 1999).
69Reynolds, “The Indian Community and the Indian Independence Movement,” p. 183.
70NAT ··. 0201.33/58. “Sonthana phak India,” p. 5.
71Reynolds, “The Indian Community and the Indian Independence Movement,” p. 176.
72NAT ··. 0201.33/58. “Khamplae sonthana khong Khana Ku Issaraphab India” [Translation of the Free India Broadcast], p. 3.
73Ibid., p. 6.
74Ibid., p. 12.
75Ibid., p. 13.
76Ibid., p. 29.
77Ibid., p. 34.
